The long-running debate around GCSE resits has reached another milestone. For more than a decade, post-16 students in England who failed to achieve a grade 4 in maths or English have been required to resit their GCSEs. While the policy aimed to improve standards, evidence shows that mandatory resits often frustrate learners, overload colleges, and fail to deliver better outcomes.
This week, MPs proposed a new approach. Instead of blanket resits, they recommend three routes that reflect learner potential, context, and future goals. For FE providers, this means major changes to planning, teaching, and accountability. It also opens up opportunities for digital platforms like askelie™ and ELIE for Education to make the transition smoother.
Why GCSE resits are back in the news
A cross-party committee has urged government to rethink the current system of compulsory resits in maths and English for students who do not pass at age 16. The argument is straightforward: while the aim of raising standards was laudable, the reality has been mixed. Many students sit exam after exam without success, draining confidence and motivation.
The committee’s report suggests that instead of one-size-fits-all resits, colleges and sixth forms should be able to place learners on one of three distinct routes. This marks a potential watershed moment in FE reform.
The three proposed routes
Route A: Targeted GCSE resits
Learners with a realistic chance of achieving grade 4 should continue with resits, supported by tailored teaching and consistent feedback. For this group, a resit can be the bridge to further study or apprenticeship entry.
Route B: Embedded maths and English
Where learners are pursuing vocational courses, core literacy and numeracy could be embedded into their main study programme. For example, a student on a construction course would learn measurement, ratios, and technical writing in context. This aligns with the push for stronger vocational pathways.
Route C: Functional skills qualifications
Students who are unlikely to pass a GCSE even with support could instead complete functional skills qualifications. These focus on applied maths and English relevant to daily life and employment, offering a practical alternative that maintains rigour without repeated exam failure.
Why this matters for colleges
For FE providers, the reform could reduce frustration, improve learner confidence, and offer more relevant pathways. But it also brings challenges:
- Assessment and placement: How do you decide which learner belongs on which route?
- Timetabling: Routes must be coordinated without overloading teaching staff.
- Funding and accountability: Government and Ofsted will want clear evidence of learner progression, even if the qualification differs.
- Communication with students and parents: Explaining why a learner is on one pathway, and not another, needs clarity and sensitivity.
The learner perspective
Students have long expressed dissatisfaction with compulsory resits. Many feel labelled as failures before they start their FE journey. Constant repetition of exams undermines confidence and motivation.
By contrast, functional skills or embedded support in vocational courses provide a sense of progress. They link learning to life and work, making education more relevant. Crucially, this reform could improve learner progression, not just in qualifications but in mindset and self-belief.
How askelie can help
ELIE for Education is built for flexibility, evidence, and personalised pathways – exactly what FE providers need to make these reforms work.
Placement made simple
ELIE can ingest prior attainment, diagnostic test scores, and attendance data to recommend the most suitable route for each learner. Staff can override recommendations, but the process is faster, more consistent, and auditable.
Clear timetables and resources
Colleges can build separate templates for resit groups, embedded learning modules, or functional skills sessions. ELIE then generates learner schedules and makes resources available in one place.
Evidence for inspection
Whether a learner is on a GCSE resit, vocational course, or functional skills, ELIE tracks attendance, assessment results, and outcomes. Dashboards make it easy to show inspectors that every student is making progress on their chosen route.
Improving learner confidence
By linking skills acquisition to real-world tasks, ELIE helps staff show learners why the work matters. A construction student measuring timber or a catering student writing menus sees maths and English in context, not just in a test paper.
Streamlined communication
ELIE automates updates to learners and parents. Instead of generic letters, each message reflects the learner’s pathway, milestones, and next steps. This clarity builds trust and reduces confusion.
Example in practice
Consider a college with 800 post-16 students below grade 4 in maths or English. Under the old system, all 800 were enrolled in GCSE resit classes, overwhelming teachers and leaving many students demoralised.
With ELIE:
- Diagnostics show 250 learners have a realistic chance of passing – Route A (resits).
- 350 are pursuing vocational pathways, such as health and social care or motor vehicle, and receive embedded maths and English – Route B.
- 200 are enrolled in functional skills qualifications – Route C.
Staff workloads are balanced, learners understand their routes, and the college can evidence progression across all three pathways. Outcomes improve without forcing repeated exam failures.
What good looks like in 12 months
If the reforms are adopted, colleges using ELIE could show:
- Higher pass rates among targeted GCSE resit students
- Stronger literacy and numeracy outcomes within vocational courses
- Greater completion rates of functional skills qualifications
- Increased learner satisfaction and confidence
- Audit-ready evidence of compliance with government expectations
Getting started
FE providers don’t need to wait for policy to become law. By piloting ELIE with current learners, colleges can test placement tools, build functional skills modules, and embed English and maths into vocational programmes now. This creates a head start and positions the college as a leader in the coming reform.
Conclusion
The debate around GCSE resits is no longer just about exams, it is about fairness, confidence, and outcomes. The proposed three-route model acknowledges that one-size-fits-all does not work.
With ELIE for Education, colleges can manage placement, track progress, and communicate clearly with students and parents. The result is smarter FE reform, more effective vocational pathways, and stronger learner progression.
For learners, it means no longer being defined by exam failure, but by progress towards skills that matter.
Comments are closed